Appellate judges quash fraud verdict against pro-democracy media tycoon, though he remains imprisoned under national security law
A Hong Kong appellate court has overturned the fraud convictions of media entrepreneur and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai, in a rare legal victory for the founder of the defunct Apple Daily newspaper.
The Court of Appeal ruled that prosecutors had failed to prove that Lai and his co-defendant knowingly made false representations in relation to alleged misuse of office lease space, concluding that the lower court’s reasoning was legally flawed.
The overturned conviction stemmed from a 2022 case in which Lai was found guilty of fraud for allegedly breaching lease terms by allowing a consultancy firm to operate from part of the newspaper’s headquarters.
He had been sentenced to five years and nine months in prison and fined two million Hong Kong dollars.
The appellate court determined that the legal duty cited by prosecutors had not been properly established and that the evidence did not support a criminal finding.
Despite the decision, Lai remains in custody following his conviction under Hong Kong’s national security law, for which he received a 20-year prison sentence.
The partial overlap between sentences means the quashing of the fraud conviction may modestly affect the total time he is required to serve.
Lai, 78, has long been a prominent critic of Beijing’s policies toward Hong Kong.
His prosecutions have drawn sustained international scrutiny, while Hong Kong authorities maintain that all proceedings are conducted in accordance with the rule of law and established legal standards.
Legal analysts note that the appellate ruling underscores the technical requirements for upholding fraud convictions, even as broader national security cases continue to shape the city’s judicial and political landscape.
The Court of Appeal ruled that prosecutors had failed to prove that Lai and his co-defendant knowingly made false representations in relation to alleged misuse of office lease space, concluding that the lower court’s reasoning was legally flawed.
The overturned conviction stemmed from a 2022 case in which Lai was found guilty of fraud for allegedly breaching lease terms by allowing a consultancy firm to operate from part of the newspaper’s headquarters.
He had been sentenced to five years and nine months in prison and fined two million Hong Kong dollars.
The appellate court determined that the legal duty cited by prosecutors had not been properly established and that the evidence did not support a criminal finding.
Despite the decision, Lai remains in custody following his conviction under Hong Kong’s national security law, for which he received a 20-year prison sentence.
The partial overlap between sentences means the quashing of the fraud conviction may modestly affect the total time he is required to serve.
Lai, 78, has long been a prominent critic of Beijing’s policies toward Hong Kong.
His prosecutions have drawn sustained international scrutiny, while Hong Kong authorities maintain that all proceedings are conducted in accordance with the rule of law and established legal standards.
Legal analysts note that the appellate ruling underscores the technical requirements for upholding fraud convictions, even as broader national security cases continue to shape the city’s judicial and political landscape.




































