
The amendment was sure to pass the country's rubber-stamp legislature, the National People's Congress, which voted 2,958 in favor, only two opposed and three abstaining.






Hong Kong’s High Court has found veteran media tycoon Jimmy Lai guilty of multiple offences, including conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and conspiracy to publish seditious material under the city’s China-imposed national security law, in a landmark verdict that could see him imprisoned for life.
The 78-year-old founder of the now-defunct pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily was convicted on all charges following a 156-day trial that began in December 2023 and drew sustained international attention to issues of press freedom and judicial independence in the global financial hub.
In open court proceedings at the West Kowloon district court, a panel of three judges concluded that Lai used his media platform and international connections to advocate foreign sanctions and hostile actions against the Hong Kong and Chinese governments, asserting that his intent was to undermine the authority of the Chinese Communist Party.
The court’s detailed 855-page ruling underscored the evidence presented by prosecutors that Lai continued his activities even after the national security law came into effect in June 2020. Lai denied all charges and had stated that his engagement with foreign officials and commentary in his publications were expressions of his views rather than criminal conduct.
Lai has been detained since his arrest in 2020 and has spent more than five years in custody, much of it in solitary confinement.
Defense lawyers are scheduled to present mitigation arguments at a pre-sentencing hearing in January, with an opportunity to seek leniency or appeal.
Those close to Lai have expressed concern about his health, citing weight loss and pre-existing conditions during his prolonged detention.
The conviction has prompted widespread international reaction, with governments and rights organisations emphasising its broader implications for civil liberties in Hong Kong.
British, U.S., European Union, Australian and Taiwanese officials publicly criticised the trial and verdict, describing the proceedings as politically motivated and warning that the case highlights an erosion of freedoms that were promised under the city’s constitutional framework.
Beijing and Hong Kong authorities, however, defended the verdict as a lawful application of the national security law and asserted that it reflects the judiciary’s duty to uphold national security.
Lai’s Apple Daily, once a vibrant voice of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement, was forced to shut down in 2021 after authorities froze the newspaper’s assets and its offices were raided.
Lai’s conviction is widely seen as one of the most consequential applications of the sweeping 2020 national security law, which was enacted in response to the large-scale protests of 2019. Supporters of Lai view the verdict as emblematic of the shrinking space for dissent and independent journalism in Hong Kong, even as officials maintain that the law is necessary to safeguard stability and security.









