China’s foreign ministry accuses the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and the European Union of interfering in its internal affairs over Hong Kong national security ruling
Beijing has responded sharply to international criticism from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and the European Union regarding the 20-year prison sentence handed to Hong Kong pro-democracy activist and former media proprietor Jimmy Lai.
In statements issued by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other official channels, authorities described foreign comments on the case as unwarranted interference in China’s internal affairs and a challenge to national sovereignty and legal integrity.
Lai, a British national and founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, was sentenced in Hong Kong on February nine after being convicted of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and other offences under the national security law imposed by Beijing.
The lengthy sentence, the harshest delivered under that law to date, has drawn firm responses from several Western capitals and organisations, prompting a vigorous diplomatic rebuttal from Chinese officials.
At a regular briefing in Beijing, the foreign ministry’s spokesperson reiterated that Lai is a Chinese citizen subject to Hong Kong’s legal system and that the judicial process reflected the principled enforcement of the law.
The ministry urged “relevant countries” to respect China’s sovereignty and refrain from making statements it characterised as meddling in judicial matters.
Canberra’s foreign minister had previously voiced concern about the broader implications of the case for freedom of expression, while Washington’s senior diplomats described the sentence as unjust and called for humanitarian consideration, including leniency or release on health grounds.
The European Union’s diplomatic service also criticised the verdict, saying it undermined press freedom and called for Lai’s immediate and unconditional release.
London has pledged continued engagement with Beijing on the matter, including through diplomatic channels raised at the highest levels during recent visits.
In its response, Beijing maintained the case was a domestic legal matter and underscored its determination to apply national security legislation firmly in Hong Kong.
China’s stance reflects a broader insistence that external criticisms of legal processes in Hong Kong amount to interference in internal affairs, a position Beijing reiterated in its representations to the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and the European Union following their statements of concern.
The diplomatic exchanges underscore deepening tensions over issues of rule of law, press freedom and national security in Hong Kong’s current legal and political environment.
In statements issued by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other official channels, authorities described foreign comments on the case as unwarranted interference in China’s internal affairs and a challenge to national sovereignty and legal integrity.
Lai, a British national and founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, was sentenced in Hong Kong on February nine after being convicted of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and other offences under the national security law imposed by Beijing.
The lengthy sentence, the harshest delivered under that law to date, has drawn firm responses from several Western capitals and organisations, prompting a vigorous diplomatic rebuttal from Chinese officials.
At a regular briefing in Beijing, the foreign ministry’s spokesperson reiterated that Lai is a Chinese citizen subject to Hong Kong’s legal system and that the judicial process reflected the principled enforcement of the law.
The ministry urged “relevant countries” to respect China’s sovereignty and refrain from making statements it characterised as meddling in judicial matters.
Canberra’s foreign minister had previously voiced concern about the broader implications of the case for freedom of expression, while Washington’s senior diplomats described the sentence as unjust and called for humanitarian consideration, including leniency or release on health grounds.
The European Union’s diplomatic service also criticised the verdict, saying it undermined press freedom and called for Lai’s immediate and unconditional release.
London has pledged continued engagement with Beijing on the matter, including through diplomatic channels raised at the highest levels during recent visits.
In its response, Beijing maintained the case was a domestic legal matter and underscored its determination to apply national security legislation firmly in Hong Kong.
China’s stance reflects a broader insistence that external criticisms of legal processes in Hong Kong amount to interference in internal affairs, a position Beijing reiterated in its representations to the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and the European Union following their statements of concern.
The diplomatic exchanges underscore deepening tensions over issues of rule of law, press freedom and national security in Hong Kong’s current legal and political environment.







































