
The changes take effect Thursday. The city's government said it would also ax a mandatory vaccine pass required to enter various premises but keep indoor and outdoor mask-wearing rules.






An increasing number of affluent individuals from mainland China are using Hong Kong as a platform to diversify globally, according to a senior executive at the Hong Kong-based lender China CITIC Bank International (CNCBI). Wendy Yuen, head of the bank’s personal and business banking group, said that the bank’s cross-border wealth-management clients from the mainland have tripled in the first half of this year, while the bank’s assets under management grew by roughly 30 per cent in the same period.
Ms Yuen explained that many wealthy mainland families are establishing family offices in Hong Kong “as a platform for them to diversify their investment portfolio,” citing the city’s broad access to international investment products and its role as an established international financial centre. The bank also reported that its fee income from wealth-management rose 50 per cent in the first half, while private bank operating income surged around 60 per cent.
The growth aligns with Hong Kong’s official drive to attract family-office activity. In a policy address in September, Chief Executive John Lee Ka‑chiu set a new target to bring in an additional 220 family offices by 2028, following the earlier achievement of onboarding 200 between 2023 and 2025. The city introduced tax incentives in 2023 and launched an investment-migration scheme last year to support the hub ambitions.
Industry commentary underscores that Hong Kong’s greater appeal stems not only from favourable tax and regulatory settings but also from initiatives such as the Wealth Management Connect (WMC) scheme and dedicated banking services tailored to cross-border wealth flows between mainland cities and Hong Kong. CNCBI’s own disclosures show the bank has set in motion a “dual-centre” private-banking strategy across Hong Kong and Singapore, delivering bespoke global-asset-allocation solutions linked to mainland clients.
Analysts say the influx reflects broader trends of mainland capital seeking diversification amid slower domestic growth and tighter regulatory controls. The surge in family-office and private-bank activity in Hong Kong is therefore both a strategic win for the city and a sign of evolving wealth-management flows in the region.
Ms Yuen noted that families are using Hong Kong not just for investment management but also succession, trust and philanthropic planning, emphasising the city’s growing role as an Asia-Pacific wealth-management hub. With increased product availability, tax efficiencies and cross-border connectivity, Hong Kong is riding a sustained wave of mainland-driven private-wealth inflows.













A new comprehensive report by Hong Kong Watch argues that Beijing is exploiting Hong Kong’s “special status” under the “one country, two systems” framework to advance Chinese diplomatic and economic interests at the expense of the city’s promised autonomy. Entitled The Limits of Autonomy: a review of Hong Kong’s special status under ‘one country, two systems’, the study details how Hong Kong has been treated differently from mainland China in international bodies and global markets and how that differential treatment is increasingly being leveraged by Beijing.
The report traces the legal foundation of Hong Kong’s autonomy under the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, and shows that since 2020 the Chinese government has actively aligned the city’s institutions with mainland policy while preserving its preferential status abroad. It documents, for example, how Hong Kong representatives have supported China’s position in blocking Taiwan’s participation in international agencies and how Hong Kong bodies have used their international standing to advance China’s foreign-policy goals.
While acknowledging the erosion of political freedom within Hong Kong, the authors emphasise that the focus must shift to how the unique status of Hong Kong is being instrumentalised. As one researcher wrote: "Hong Kong’s autonomy brings diplomatic and economic benefits which the People’s Republic of China is loath to lose … the new security era is not simply about dismantling freedoms but about exploiting Hong Kong’s status as a ‘highly autonomous’ region for diplomatic and economic gain."
The report makes several policy recommendations for the United Kingdom, United States, Canada and the European Union. Key among them: the United States should review legislation and policy documents that still treat Hong Kong as autonomous; governments should reassess consular privileges and immunities of Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices; and a coordinated effort should be made to establish a United Nations special envoy to monitor developments in Hong Kong’s autonomy.
In the context of intensifying Sino-U.S. competition, the analysis argues that policymakers must recognise that preferential treatment of Hong Kong may inadvertently further Chinese state interests rather than protect the city’s freedoms. The timing comes as Washington has already sanctioned six Chinese and Hong Kong officials for eroding Hong Kong’s autonomy and declared that Hong Kong no longer warrants differential treatment under U.S. law. The report underscores that aligning legal status and actual governance is crucial to preserve both international norms and Hong Kong’s distinct role.
For governments committed to supporting Hong Kong’s original promises, the study stresses that closing legal and institutional loopholes is now as important as monitoring political repression. Without that, the city’s special status may continue to be repurposed by Beijing, undermining the autonomy it was designed to uphold.
