
In a surprise escalation in U.S.–Russia relations, President Donald Trump has ordered the deployment of two American nuclear submarines to undisclosed locations following threatening remarks from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The move comes amid rising diplomatic and military friction, tied to a ten-day ultimatum issued by the White House for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
This week, President Trump issued a stark message: Russia has ten days to halt its operations in Ukraine or face severe economic retaliation. In response, Dmitry Medvedev, now Deputy Chair of Russia’s National Security Council, posted a warning that Russia holds nuclear strike capabilities and will not yield to threats. Medvedev accused the U.S. president of pushing dangerous ultimatums and escalating beyond bilateral disputes.
Trump responded on Truth Social, stating he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines “just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.” He added, “Words are very important and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.”
Although Trump did not clarify whether the submarines are armed with nuclear warheads, their deployment underscores the serious tone of the standoff. The U.S. maintains over a dozen ballistic missile submarines as part of its nuclear triad—capable of launching warheads from undetectable positions at sea.
Dmitry Medvedev has long been seen as a hardliner since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Though his current political power is limited compared to President Vladimir Putin, his social media activity has been increasingly belligerent. For over three years, Medvedev has published provocative posts aimed at the West—many of which were previously ignored. But his most recent comments triggered a rare and immediate reaction from a sitting U.S. president.
Despite the gravity of the exchange, official Russian institutions—the Kremlin, the Foreign Ministry, and the Ministry of Defence—have yet to issue any formal response. Local analysts suggest that Moscow is in a state of uncertainty, trying to assess the seriousness of the U.S. submarine deployment and its implications.
The Moscow Stock Exchange reacted immediately, dropping sharply after Trump’s announcement. Russian media has expressed shock at the scale and tone of Trump’s reaction, with one publication suggesting that even Medvedev himself was likely surprised by the U.S. president’s sudden retaliation.
Amid the heightened rhetoric, Trump’s special envoy, Steve Whitkov, is expected to arrive in Russia in the coming days, reportedly to meet with senior officials—possibly even Vladimir Putin. Russian media mocked the envoy’s sudden emergence, comparing him to “a rabbit pulled from a magician’s hat,” with Trump cast as the magician.
Whether Whitkov’s visit can ease tensions remains uncertain. With Washington setting a hard deadline for Russian de-escalation in Ukraine, and Moscow offering little sign of compliance, the mission is being viewed with skepticism in both capitals.
The exact location of the deployed submarines remains classified. In the past, the U.S. has used the publicized movement of its nuclear submarines as a message—part deterrent, part warning. However, it remains unclear if Trump’s move is a symbolic gesture or a strategic repositioning with tactical implications.
Secretary of State and National Security Advisor aides have attempted to downplay Medvedev’s relevance, stating that he holds no direct decision-making power in Moscow. Yet Trump’s decision to act—rather than merely respond rhetorically—marks a significant departure from previous administrations’ handling of such threats.
The clock is now ticking. Trump’s ultimatum expires at the end of next week. If Russia fails to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, sweeping sanctions could follow—targeting not only Russia but its major trading partners, including India and China.
Whether this will deter Moscow remains uncertain. Trump himself has publicly expressed doubts, saying he doesn’t believe sanctions will change President Putin’s behavior. The unfolding crisis raises fresh concerns about unintended escalation, especially given the involvement of nuclear-capable platforms.
In Washington, the White House insists this was a necessary move to protect American interests and signal resolve. In Moscow, analysts describe a sense of disbelief, with some suggesting Medvedev’s post was never intended to provoke a direct military response.
The coming days are critical. With submarines in motion, envoys en route, and economic sanctions on standby, the U.S.–Russia relationship enters one of its most volatile chapters in recent memory.
Germany is spiraling into a severe economic breakdown. The industrial engine that once defined Europe’s postwar recovery is faltering under the weight of debt, deindustrialization, and foreign trade warfare. Bankruptcies are climbing, exports are collapsing, and the economy is shrinking for a third consecutive year.
Now, in a move both familiar and ominous, Berlin is redirecting its national strategy away from innovation and economic reform—toward full-blown rearmament and war-preparation. Not for defence. But for aggression. For leverage. For survival.
The 2026 federal budget includes a record one hundred seventy-four billion euros in new borrowing. Public investment is pegged at one hundred twenty-six billion euros. Fiscal restraint is gone. The constitutional “debt brake” once championed by Germany as a pillar of Eurozone stability has been overridden.
Meanwhile, insolvencies surged past twenty-four thousand in 2025, an eleven percent increase over the previous year. The trend is worsening. German industry is crumbling from within—choked by regulation, crushed by foreign tariffs, and unable to adapt.
Mercedes-Benz reported a collapse in profits by over sixty percent in the first half of the year. Thyssenkrupp is slashing over eleven thousand jobs. The chemicals giant BASF is shifting production to China. The auto industry—once untouchable—is being decimated by tariff warfare from the U.S. and outcompeted by Chinese EVs globally.
Germany’s green energy and industrial transition is failing to gain traction. Green steel is too expensive to survive. Even Germany’s own government reportedly avoids buying it—preferring cheaper, dirtier alternatives.
At the root of the collapse lies a culture-wide failure to innovate. Germany, like much of Europe, is structurally hostile to startups. There is no major tech hub. No venture capital ecosystem of global scale. No tolerance for risk. What dominates instead is a bureaucracy-driven engineering mindset—designed to preserve existing structures, not invent new ones.
High taxes, suffocating regulation, and a fixation on industrial process over creative vision have frozen Germany’s ability to evolve. The future industries—AI, synthetic biology, advanced robotics, clean energy storage—are being invented elsewhere. Germany builds machines. Others build the future.
Germany’s largest export market—the United States—now imposes fifteen percent tariffs on most EU goods. For German cars, the rate is crushing. Although Mercedes and BMW have U.S.-based production that partially shields them, firms like Audi and Porsche are absorbing direct hits.
Steel exports are now facing fifty percent tariffs. Aluminum isn’t far behind. Pharmaceuticals, long exempt from trade wars, are suddenly under review by the Trump administration. The message from Washington is blunt: pay to play.
But the trade deal Germany was forced into isn’t just economic. It was political. In exchange for avoiding even worse tariffs, Berlin agreed to buy hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of U.S. arms and make vague promises about investing into the American economy. These promises are not enforceable—but they serve their purpose: public humiliation.
Rather than face the structural truth—economic collapse due to an outdated model—Germany is reverting to an old script. Redirect domestic failure toward external mobilization. Rebuild national unity around weapons, not reforms. Shift from productivity to militarization.
Germany now spends nearly five percent of its GDP on military expansion. It is not defence spending—it is war infrastructure. There is no foreign invasion, no existential military threat. Russia has not crossed a NATO border. But Germany is preparing, posturing, and arming as if war is already underway.
The target isn’t just Moscow. It’s the entire geopolitical landscape—where Berlin seeks to regain leverage, significance, and purpose through force. Just as it has done in the past.
While the United States extracts loyalty through tariffs and weapons contracts, China is dismantling Germany’s industrial edge. Chinese electric cars, green steel, solar panels, and digital infrastructure are cheaper, faster, and better backed. Germany cannot compete on price. And without innovation, it cannot compete on value either.
Even rare earth elements—essential to Germany’s machine tools and energy systems—are now weaponized by Beijing. As a result, German manufacturers are experiencing production halts due to component shortages.
China is not mentioned in official documents. But every German official knows: China is the real industrial threat. America is the political dominator. Germany is squeezed between two powers—and has no independent strategy.
For decades, German foreign policy was shaped by business interests. Today, that model is collapsing. Even the automotive lobby—once able to dictate government decisions—was sidelined during the U.S. tariff negotiations. The result was not total disaster, but it was a signal: industry no longer comes first.
Worse, industry no longer leads. Germany no longer builds the world’s most desired products. It no longer shapes the global marketplace. It is now reactive—subsidizing old sectors, begging for fair treatment, and throwing money at crises rather than creating opportunity.
There is no comprehensive strategy for reinvention. The move toward militarization is not a forward-looking pivot. It is a desperation move. A bet that weapons production and wartime alignment can fill the vacuum left by failed exports and dead innovation.
What’s missing is a plan. A new industrial identity. A future Germany can build for itself—independent of America’s dictates or China’s pricing.
Some propose new focus areas—like anti-aging tech, high-end pharmaceuticals, or synthetic biology. But without reforming taxation, deregulating innovation, and embracing entrepreneurial culture, those ideas will remain words on paper.
For now, Germany is not solving its crisis. It is militarizing its way through it. Just like it has before.
Do you know what my biggest regret was?
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
I invented something that got a billion people addicted, but I never taught you how to quit.
Remember, January 9th, 2007, I said, today, Apple is gonna reinvent the phone.
I was wrong.
We didn't reinvent the phone, we reinvented loneliness.
Today, you unlock your phone 96 times a day, you spend over eight hours looking at your screen, but less than eight minutes looking at your family.
We created a tool to connect seven billion people only to turn each of us into an island.
So today for my first AI presentation since my return, I'm not here to redefine the iPhone 20 or to showcase an iPhone.
I am here to explore with you an ultimate human question.
When AI can do anything, what is left for humans to do?
AI can write a sonnet worthy of Shakespeare, but can it write the love letter you wrote with trembling hands to your first love?
AI can paint the Mona Lisa, but can it paint the sun your child scribbled in their first drawing?
AI can compose a symphony like Beethoven, but can it hum the lullaby your mother sang to you?
It can't, because what we've always wanted isn't perfection.
It's the imperfect, mistake-making, heart-beating, the real you.
Yes, AI is here, and it's 10,000 times more powerful than the iPhone.
So I'm telling you, learn AI.
Use AI.
Master AI.
But remember, AI is here to help you become a better human, not as an excuse to be less of one.
Use AI to save time, then waste that time on the beautiful things in life.
Use AI to increase your efficiency, then be inefficient,
Excuse me.
If I could do it all over again, I would change every later to right now.
I would change every after I'm done with this to let's do this now.
So right now, share this video with someone you love, go find them, look them in the eyes, say the words you've left unsaid,
Give the hug you've always owed them, make the call you've been meaning to make.
Because AI can bring me back to life, but it can't bring back the I'm sorry you missed the chance to say.
AI can copy my thoughts, but it can't copy the I love you you missed the chance to share.
AI can recreate my image, but it can't recreate the hug you missed the chance to give.
Do you know what death taught me?
That there's always tomorrow really means there is no tomorrow.
That we'll talk next time really means we'll never talk.
And that some other day really means that day will never come.
One more thing, I'm back in an AI form to witness this great new era with all of you.
And so in every future presentation, more people who change the world will join us.
I hope that each of our conversations can help you or give you a little inspiration for your future.
This is the meaning of my return.
Who do you want to see?
I will always be here with you.
See you next time.
For those who love life and live in the now.
On July 31, Cambodian Defence Minister General Tea Seiha formally invited General Nattaphon Narkphanit, Thailand’s Deputy Defence Minister, to attend the GBC meeting in Phnom Penh. However, General Nattaphon responded by proposing that the venue be moved to Malaysia—a neutral location—while suggesting revised dates of August 4–7, to which Cambodia has now officially consented.
As part of efforts to ensure transparency and reinforce mediation, General Tea Seiha has also invited Malaysia, the United States, and China to participate as official observers of the GBC talks. These three nations were acknowledged for their pivotal roles in facilitating the ceasefire discussions earlier in July.
“We sincerely hope that this meeting will be constructive and yield positive results,” stated Lieutenant General Maly Socheata, spokesperson for Cambodia’s Ministry of Defence.
Status of Detained Soldiers and Humanitarian Coordination
Lieutenant General Maly also addressed the situation involving 20 Cambodian soldiers currently detained by Thai authorities, stating that Thailand has confirmed the detainees are in good condition. Cambodia is actively engaged in negotiations for their immediate repatriation, in accordance with international humanitarian law. As the current ASEAN Chair, Malaysia has been requested to assist in mediating and expediting the release and safe return of the soldiers.